Manhattan WMS Extension Development

@vishal1145

Your extension strategy will fail certification if you hook into undocumented MOCA events that Manhattan deprecates in the next release. I've seen three WMS upgrades stall because custom RF screens bypassed the standard SCI layer and broke when Manhattan refactored their session handling. Quick questions - are you targeting WMOS or Manhattan Active, and do you have existing custom tables that need migration into the new extension schema? Here is the architectural approach: - MOCA FRAMEWORK: Build all workflows as standalone MOCA commands with explicit input/output contracts so Manhattan's upgrade validator can parse dependencies without false positives. - INTEGRATION FRAMEWORK: Use MIF adapters with versioned XML schemas for inbound/outbound messages, ensuring backward compatibility when Manhattan patches their core integration engine. - REGRESSION TESTING: Automate test execution through your CI pipeline using Manhattan's command-line test harness, capturing baseline snapshots before each sprint so QA can diff results against known-good states. I've delivered four production extensions for WMOS clients in 3PL and retail distribution that survived two major version upgrades without rework. Let's schedule a 20-minute technical review to confirm your current Manhattan version and extension boundaries before we lock the sprint plan.

@mahads31

Having carved out a niche specializing in developing complex solutions for businesses, I am ideally positioned to tackle your Manhattan WMS project. My extensive experience in JavaScript, PHP and other programming languages equips me to efficiently and effectively handle the upgrade-safe extension development work, ensuring that they sit smoothly on the MOCA framework without causing disruptions to core processes. One of the areas where I truly excel is collaborating with clients throughout the development process, and your project's "short sprint" approach aligns perfectly with my own workflow. My familiarity with Git repositories for feature review in conjunction with my thoroughness in documentation (table changes, hooks, and configuration tweaks) will guarantee comprehensive coverage and future compatibility for your needs. In terms of testing and quality assurance, my work has always spoken for itself. Through rigorous unit testing as well as regression tests for all custom logics, I have consistently delivered clean compiles and zero failed tests. I have no doubt that the same unfailing attention to detail will be reflected in this project as well. Overall, let me assure you that partnering with me means not just getting the work done but gaining a dependable digital product partner who prioritizes long-term business growth.

@mayankinnovative

With over two decades of experience under my belt, I couldn't be more prepared to tackle your project. My core expertise in Java, MOCA scripting, SCI reporting and the Manhattan Integration Framework aligns perfectly with your need for seasoned Manhattan WMS developers. Moreover, my discipline in documenting table changes, hooks, and configuration tweaks is always present, ensuring we keep track of every intricate detail of your project. What sets me apart is my approach to problem-solving. I don't just fix the issue at hand; I focus on building long-term, reliable solutions that scale with your business. This aligns perfectly with your requirement of "upgrade-safe extensions that sit cleanly on the MOCA framework”, as I always work towards future-proofing systems. Lastly, my dedication to clean, maintainable code will guarantee successful promotion paths for source code and deployment scripts - a crucial aspect when dealing with essential systems such as warehouse management. With me on your team, you can expect zero failed tests and a seamlessly integrated solution that speaks to improved warehouse efficiency together with effortless compatibility with future Manhattan releases. Let's create something great together!

@ubaidalam217

Hi, I’ve reviewed your requirements and understand that you need **upgrade-safe Manhattan WMS extensions** built around the MOCA framework without modifying core Manhattan objects. I can work on: * Custom MOCA workflows and scripts * RF screen development * Java-based extensions * Manhattan Integration Framework adapters * SCI reports and reporting logic * Custom database/configuration changes * Unit and regression testing * Deployment/promotion scripts * Technical documentation for objects, hooks, tables and configuration I would keep all customizations isolated from core objects so future Manhattan upgrades remain manageable. I can also work sprint-by-sprint through Git, with each feature reviewed before QA. One important point: I don’t want to claim previous WMOS/Manhattan Active production deployments if they cannot be demonstrated. I’m comfortable reviewing your sandbox and specifications first and confirming the exact implementation approach based on your Manhattan version and environment. Please share the functional specs and sandbox details, and I can review the first feature and discuss the scope with you. Best Regards, **Ubaid Alam**

@FreeLancers360

Hi, Thanks for posting "Manhattan WMS Extension Development" — it lands right in our wheelhouse, and we'd be thrilled to bring it to life. What stood out to me is how clearly you’ve described what you want — and clarity like that is where we deliver our very best work. From your brief I can see this involves promo — all areas we handle in-house. We specialise in PHP, Java, JavaScript, Software Architecture, which lines up directly with what you need. How we'd approach it: - Lock the concept, script and storyboard so we’re aligned before production starts - Produce the animation/edit with polished motion graphics and sound design - Two revision rounds to fine-tune pacing, on-screen text and branding - Deliver final renders in every format and aspect ratio you need I also noted you don’t need touching core objects — that’s clear, and I’ll keep the work clean and strictly on-brief. You can count on tight communication, on-time delivery, and a result that’s effortless to sign off on. If it helps, I can share a couple of relevant samples and a short plan before you decide. Looking forward to it! Best regards, FreeLancers360 Let’s connect in chat and get started — message me anytime and I’ll reply right away!

@tyronet2

You need to optimize an existing Windows terminal ZIP utility so it keeps the exact CLI workflow and archive output while cutting real compression time in milliseconds. I have 9+ years of production experience with C/C++, C#, debugging, software architecture and performance optimization. I’ll profile the current implementation first using your sample archives, measuring CPU, I/O, memory allocation, threading and checksum overhead before changing the compression path. Then I’ll apply only optimizations that produce a measurable gain, such as parallel processing, SIMD/hardware acceleration, a faster compression implementation or targeted low-level changes. I’ll preserve archive compatibility and verify byte-for-byte output against the current version. You’ll receive the optimized Windows build, source changes, reproducible before/after benchmarks and build/run notes. One point I’d confirm first: what does “EIP” specifically refer to in your current code or requirements?

@LeadForce1

Hi, "MOCA-Safe Extensions With Tested Integration Hooks" - you need new WMS workflows without creating upgrade problems later I can structure the extensions around the MOCA framework and keep custom logic isolated from Manhattan core objects. I’d treat RF screens, workflows and integration adapters as separate pieces, with clear object/configuration records so future Manhattan upgrades remain easier to manage. I can work with Java, JavaScript, PHP, software architecture, regression testing and technical documentation. I’ll also keep the source and deployment scripts organized for the promotion path, with tests covering the custom logic before QA review. Which Manhattan version and MOCA/SCI environment will the sandbox use for the first workflow? Looking forward to working with you. Luigi Tedy

@PrateekP3003

Hi, Your priority is clear: extend Manhattan WMS through supported MOCA patterns without modifying core objects, so new warehouse workflows and integrations remain upgrade-safe. I’d build each extension as a clean, independently deployable customization with regression coverage and documentation for future Manhattan releases. >>>Project Key Points: MOCA-based extensions, custom RF screens, warehouse workflows, SCI reporting, Manhattan Integration Framework adapters, Java/MOCA scripting, Git-based sprint delivery, deployment scripts, unit/regression testing, configuration tracking, and upgrade-safe architecture. Execution Plan: I’ll start by mapping each functional requirement to the appropriate MOCA objects, hooks, RF flows and integration points, avoiding core modifications wherever possible. Changes will be isolated, version-controlled and documented so your team can trace every table/configuration change and safely promote builds through the standard environment path. Each sprint will include implementation, unit tests and regression validation before QA hand-off. I’ll also provide deployment scripts, object lists, data-model notes and configuration steps alongside the source code. With 7+ years in enterprise application development, I’m comfortable working with Java-based systems, warehouse workflows, APIs, integrations and disciplined release processes. Looking forward to collaborating with you! Best regards, Prateek

@viktoriao4

❤️❤️❤️Hi there❤️❤️❤️ The opportunity to enhance Manhattan WMS with upgrade-safe extensions that boost warehouse efficiency excites me. The focus on new workflows, RF screens, and integration adapters aligns perfectly with my expertise in Java, MOCA scripting, and the Manhattan Integration Framework. I prioritize quality over price, ensuring on-time delivery and 100% satisfaction! For this project, I plan to meticulously document every table change, hook, and configuration tweak, ensuring seamless compatibility with future Manhattan releases. My approach includes delivering source code and deployment scripts for a standard Manhattan promotion path, comprehensive unit and regression test cases, and concise technical documentation covering all custom logic. Additionally, I will leverage my experience in shipping extensions for Manhattan WMOS to streamline the development process. I believe that thorough testing and robust technical documentation are key to successful project outcomes, leading to easy maintenance and scalability in the long run. I would like to discuss the assignment in our conversation. Thank you for your time. If you don't mind, please reach out to me. Best regards, viktoria

@Abror86

Hi-Abror Here From Uzbekistan. **"UPGRADE-SAFE MANHATTAN WMS EXTENSIONS"** - You want MOCA-based extensions that remain compatible with future Manhattan releases. I can build isolated Java and MOCA extensions for new workflows, RF screens, SCI reporting, and integrations without modifying Manhattan core objects. I will provide promotion-ready source, deployment scripts, regression tests, object and data-model documentation, configuration notes, and Git-based sprint reviews. Which Manhattan environment and version should I target first for the initial sandbox implementation? Looking forward to working with you.

@mikes126

The key here is keeping every extension outside Manhattan’s core objects — so future WMOS/Active upgrades don’t turn custom workflows into a maintenance problem. I’d structure the work around the MOCA extension points first, then build the RF screens and integration adapters as isolated custom components. For each sprint, I’d keep the changes reviewable in Git and document the hooks, tables, configuration, and deployment steps as they’re introduced. For the technical side, I can work across Java, MOCA scripting, SCI reporting, and integration-layer development, with unit/regression coverage around the custom logic and a clean promotion package for QA. One thing I’d confirm before starting: are you extending Manhattan WMOS or Manhattan Active, and which version/release is currently running in the sandbox? If you can share one representative workflow/spec, I can outline exactly where I’d hook into MOCA and how I’d keep it upgrade-safe. Available to start with the first sprint and review it with your team.

@alluankit01

Hi, I can build upgrade-safe Manhattan WMS extensions on the MOCA framework without modifying core objects. My approach will be to first review your functional specs, sandbox setup, RF workflow needs, integration points, promotion path, and QA rules. Then I’ll develop the required MOCA scripts, Java components, RF screens, SCI/reporting updates, and integration adapters in a clean Git-based sprint workflow. I’m comfortable with Manhattan WMS extension patterns, MOCA scripting, Java, RF workflows, Manhattan Integration Framework, SCI reporting, deployment scripts, regression testing, and technical documentation. Deliverables: * Upgrade-safe custom extensions * MOCA scripts and Java code * RF screen/workflow changes * Integration adapters * SCI/reporting support * Deployment/promotion scripts * Unit and regression test cases * Git-based source handover * Object/configuration documentation * Table/hook/change notes I’ll focus on clean architecture, no core-object changes, clear documentation, and QA-ready delivery so the extensions remain maintainable through future Manhattan upgrades. Best regards Ankit

@bojans9

Hi-Bojan Here From Serbia. **"UPGRADE-SAFE MANHATTAN WMS EXTENSIONS"** - You want MOCA extensions that improve workflows without modifying Manhattan core objects. I can develop Java and MOCA extensions with clean integration, upgrade safety, RF workflows, adapters, testing, and documentation. I will deliver promotion-ready code, regression tests, configuration notes, and validated changes through your sandbox and Git workflow. Which Manhattan version and MOCA/SCI environment should I target for the first extension? Looking forward to working with you.

@ayushsoftcare

As a seasoned Java developer with plenty of experience in the Manhattan WMS domain, I believe I'm a perfect fit for your project. Over the years, I've honed my skills in Java, MOCA scripting, and SCI reporting - all vital for successful extensions on the MOCA framework. My deep familiarity with the Manhattan Integration Framework will be invaluable as we strive to keep your extensions fully compatible with future Manhattan releases, by avoiding any core object modifications. For every task you assign, I'm committed to following an agile approach - collaborative and transparent. Your functional specs will be meticulously implemented and reviewed at each sprint ensuring that all deployed features are refined and bug-free. Moreover, I value extensive documentation that guarantees no time is wasted trying to understand or troubleshoot the work later on. Lastly, not only have I shipped several extensions for Manhattan WMOS and Manhattan Active, but my reputation also stems from creating high-quality work with no compromise on performance. I understand the importance of delivering code that's deployment-ready – thoroughly tested (including any regression test needed), well-packaged, and equipped with exhaustive technical documentation. Thank you for considering me!

@Cruz1217

Adding new workflows and RF screens on top of MOCA without touching core objects can be fragile when Manhattan upgrades change internal tables. I'll isolate the custom code in separate MOCA scripts and use the Integration Framework adapters to keep the core untouched. All changes will live in the shared Git sandbox and be packaged with the standard promotion path for easy deployment. A common mistake is hard-coding table names in MOCA hooks, which breaks as soon as a patch adds a new column. I always read the spec, then add a layer of abstraction that pulls table names from the configuration so upgrades stay safe. You can expect a clean compile, zero failed tests, and clear documentation that shows every hook and table change.

@bhargav922002

Hello, I'm bharghav, and I bring 10 years of experience in matching job skills, particularly focusing on PHP, Java, JavaScript, and Software Architecture. My expertise aligns well with your need for seasoned Manhattan WMS developers. I understand your requirement for developing upgrade-safe extensions on the MOCA framework, aiming to enhance warehouse workflows without compromising core functionalities. I will ensure that the new RF screens and integration adapters are meticulously crafted to improve efficiency while remaining compatible with future Manhattan releases. Through structured sprints and collaborative reviews of each feature in a shared Git repository, we'll keep our development on track and transparent, meeting your standards for documentation and compliance. I'd love to discuss this project further to ensure a thorough understanding of your expectations and to share insights on how we can achieve the desired outcomes together. Please start a chat with me at your earliest convenience so we can dive deeper into the specifics. Best regards, bhargav922002

@naeem1114

When you layer new MOCA extensions on top of existing workflows, hidden table name collisions can break future upgrades. I'll isolate each custom table with a unique prefix and add a version check hook that aborts if the core schema changes. This keeps the core objects untouched while letting the new RF screens and adapters run safely. A common pitfall is relying on static SCI reports that stop working after a patch changes field IDs. I’ll generate the adapters using the Integration Framework's dynamic mapping so the code adapts to schema shifts. Ready to start immediately and push the first feature to your shared Git repo.

@emanf627

As an experienced full-stack developer with specialization in React.js, Node.js, and Laravel/PHP, my expertise aligns perfectly with the requirements of your Manhattan WMS Extension project. I understand the significance of building upgrade-safe extensions on the MOCA framework while enhancing warehouse functionalities. My knowledge of Java, MOCA scripting, SCI reporting, and Manhattan Integration Framework would allow me to make seamless yet impactful modifications which will improve your warehouse efficiency. Collaboration is key and I appreciate your transparent approach of sharing functional specs and a dedicated sandbox for this project. I believe in agile methodologies and through short sprints, we can evolve features efficiently as per your evolving requirements. My experience with shared Git repositories and QA practices makes sure each feature is reviewed thoroughly before getting deployed. The deliverables you expect are not new to me. I am experienced in creating clean source code, deployment scripts, unit/regression test cases covering all logic and comprehensive technical documentation. Rest assured, I will ensure a clean compile with zero failed tests and provide you concise documentation addressing table changes, hooks, configuration tweaks,and more. Choose me for an efficient yet reliable implementation that is signed-off by your internal QA team!

@Pitchly

Hi, Manhattan extension work tends to go wrong in the same quiet way: something gets hung off a core object because the sandbox allowed it, and the next Manhattan release breaks it during a promotion nobody budgeted time for. Straight answer first, because it's more use to you than a pitch. Deep MOCA scripting and SCI reporting inside WMOS or Active isn't our ground, and pretending otherwise would cost you a sprint finding out. What we do build is the layer around a WMS: web-facing screens, dashboards and adapters that read from the warehouse system and hand work to people, hand-coded so there's no plugin stack to break. If any part of this scope is that rather than core MOCA extension work, it's worth separating out before you award. A few quick questions: 1. Are the RF screens native Manhattan RF, or browser-based on handhelds? 2. Does anything in this scope face customers or suppliers outside the warehouse?