Deeksha S. Profile

KEŞFEDİN

Employment Law

Family Law

Intellectual Property Law

Legal

Translation

4,4

(2 değerlendirme)

Şu anda adlı kullanıcıyı takip ediyorsunuz.

Kullanıcıyı takip etmede hata.

Bu kullanıcı kullanıcıların kendisini takip etmesine izin vermiyor.

Zaten bu kullanıcıyı takip ediyorsunuz.

Üyelik planınız sadece 0 takibe izin veriyor. Buradan yükseltme yapın.

Kullanıcının takip edilmesi başarılı bir şekilde bırakıldı.

Kullanıcının takip edilmesinde hata.

adlı kullanıcıyı başarılı bir şekilde tavsiye ettiniz

Kullanıcıyı tavsiye etmede hata.

Bir şeyler yanlış gitti. Lütfen sayfayı yenileyin ve tekrar deneyin.

E-posta başarılı bir şekilde doğrulandı.

$20 USD / saat

lucknow,

india

$20 USD / saat

Şu anda burada saat 9:54 ÖÖ

Kasım 28, 2020 tarihinde katıldı

0 Tavsiye

Deeksha S.

@LDeeksha

4,4

(2 değerlendirme)

3,0

$20 USD / saat

lucknow,

india

$20 USD / saat

%100

Tamamlanmış İş

%100

Bütçe Dahilinde

%100

Zamanında

Mevcut değil

Tekrar İşe Alınma Oranı

Legal advice | Contracts | Writing | Assistance

With more than three years of experience in the field, I am confident in my ability to provide excellent services in the following areas: -commercial, -corporate, -privacy, trademark, and copyright laws, -contract drafting, legal documentation -legal research, legal writing, and article writing. I understand the value of client satisfaction and strive to provide exceptional work and support. I am here to help you with a content license contract, a business management contract, or website compliance. Connect with me to learn how I can assist you with your legal and writing needs. Let us collaborate to achieve success. P.S. Don't hesitate to send me a note with any questions or concerns you may have.

Employment Lawyers freelancerlarından India içinden olanlarının tümünü görün.

Deeksha S. ile işiniz hakkında iletişime geçin

Sohbet üzerinden herhangi bir detayı tartışmak için giriş yapın.

Portföy Ögeleri

Client Goal:
-The client's goal was to have a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) prepared for a transaction.
-The client was planning to get into exclusive dealing with the seller to initiate a new business venture.
-The client wanted to keep the details of the transaction confidential between both parties throughout the process.

My Contribution:
-My contribution included drafting a comprehensive and effective NDA that met the client's needs.
-I included clauses that protected the client's confidential information and prevented the seller from disclosing it to anyone else.
-I provided one-on-one consultations to the client, taking them through the contract, advising them, and answering any questions the client had.

Summary of Project Success:
-The project was successful as the client was able to obtain a well-drafted NDA for their business transaction.
-My legal expertise and ability to communicate effectively helped the client understand the legal advice and make informed decisions.

Legal Consultation-Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)

Değerlendirmeler

Değişiklikler kaydedildi

2 değerlendirme içinden 1 - 2 arasındakiler gösteriliyor

Değerlendirmeleri filtreleme kriteri:

5,0

$249,00 USD

Constitutional Law Assignment

Great freelancer. I can recommend with no hesitation.

+1 daha

George P.

@ivanovpetrovian

•

3 ay önce

3,4

$123,33 USD

Project for Deeksha S.

Working with Deeksha was alright. The work was delivered but communication and support of delivery was less than expected. Acceptable work but not a team fit.

+1 daha

Hunter T.

@Trawick84

•

4 ay önce

Deneyim

Law Firm

Oca 2021 - Şu anda

Participation in both criminal and civil cases on an active basis. Drafted contracts and other legal papers successfully. Filing of documentation to the competent authority.

Rlegal Law Firm

Eyl 2020 - Nis 2021 (7 ay, 1 gün)

As part of my job, I had to write and review contracts, prepare documents to make sure the website followed the rules, make blogs for the firm's website, and do legal research for petitions, writs, and other things.

Libertatem.in

Eyl 2020 - Şub 2021 (5 ay, 1 gün)

My work consisted primarily of summarizing and evaluating court cases from the North Zone.

Nitelikler

Addictive Learning

2020

I learned about contract law and its applications. I established great communication skills to clearly and effectively communicate with clients, opposing attorneys, and other stakeholders. I learned how to write and audit contracts to avoid ambiguity, and how to use mediation and arbitration to resolve issues efficiently. I learned to negotiate, comprehend everyone's interests, and make mutually beneficial arrangements.

Internshala.com

2020

Through a variety of assignments, including but not limited to dialogue writing, story writing, and screenwriting, I was able to hone my skills in creative writing, proofreading, copywriting, editing, fiction, and nonfiction. Also, I passed with a grade of 91%.

Yayınlar

Delhi High Court Dismisses Appeal in a Case for Encashment of Bank Guarantees

Libertatem

In the case of United Constructions v UOI through dte. gen md accn project and anr. Justice Manmohan and Justice Sanjeev Narula held that no grounds were proven showing encashment of bank guarantees. Consequently, the present appeal was dismissed.

Delhi HC Refuses to Take Legal Action, States False Complaint u/s 376 of IPC

Libertatem

In the case of Jaskaran Singh Arora v State, NCT of Delhi and Anr., Justice Suresh Kumar Kait, the court decided not to take any action against respondent 2 and referred to a similar case of Danish Ali v. State and Anr. in Crl. M.C. 1727/2019, for false complaint under section 376 of IPC.

Delhi HC Allows Pension to Non-Commissioned Defense Officers on Pro-Rata Basis

Libertatem

In the case of Brijlal Kumar and ors. v. UOI and ors., Justice Asha Menon and Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw ruled that officers of defense forces who are non-commissioned are entitled to pro-rata pension, which was only given to commissioned officers.

Delhi High Court Dismisses Petition in Interim Maintenance Matter: Found No Proof for Interference

Libertatem

In the case of Amit Dhiman v Boski Dhiman, Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri found no ground to interfere in order passed by the family court regarding maintenance and dismissed the petition in absence of proof that showed respondent was earning which made her ineligible for receiving any maintenance. Court also stated that there’s a difference between ‘capable of earning’ and ‘actual earning’.

Delhi HC: Retention of Dishonest Government Employee Will Send Wrong Signals

Libertatem

In the case of Sunil Kumar Yadav v Union of India and ORS. Justice Asha Menon held that if a government employee is dishonest, who kept smuggled gold in his possession and for such seizure, he did not make any reports to his superiors. Retention of such employees in service will send inappropriate messages.

Amendment Allowed by Delhi HC in the Statement of Defense in the Case of Equitable Set-Off

Libertatem

In the case of Lt. Col. H. S. Bedi Retired and Anr. v STCI Finance Limited, Mr. Justice V. Kameshwar Rao, observed that rejection, if done, the substantive rights of the petitioners will be decided and the petitioners cannot in the future, claim any relief as petitioners have sought for in form of an amendment. Accordingly, the Court allowed the petition for incorporating amendments subject to Rs. 1,00,000/- payment to the respondent.